What is a consequence of not establishing clear classification standards?

Establishing clear classification standards is crucial for managing sensitive information effectively. When these standards are not in place, there is a significant risk of inconsistency in how sensitive information is handled. This inconsistency can lead to various problems, such as misinterpretation of what should be classified, potential leaks of sensitive data, and discrepancies in how employees treat and protect this information.

Without clear guidelines, individuals may not know whether certain information deserves a specific classification level, which could result in unauthorized disclosures or the mishandling of private data. Therefore, the absence of clear classification standards directly undermines the organization's ability to maintain effective security protocols for sensitive information, leading to potentially severe consequences, including breaches and a loss of trust in the data management practices of the organization.

The other options do not align with the implications of lacking clear classification standards. Higher employee engagement and enhanced public trust would not typically be associated outcomes when there is confusion or inconsistency in handling sensitive information. Similarly, a lack of clear standards generally does not lead to a decrease in administrative workload; rather, it may increase it due to the need for clarification and rectification of errors arising from inconsistent handling of classified information.